Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Shaw v. Dermatology Realm et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dermatology Realm, Clarx Big Country Dermatology, Memphis Dermatology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braseel v. Grundy County Government et al (TV2)
as 1:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Adam Braseel
Defendant:
Grundy County Government, Estate of Brent Myers, Lonnie Cleek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bradley et al v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services et al.
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bradley and Heather Bradley
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Children's Services, Sheila Baker, Mike Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Claiborne County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
RB, Joe Baker and Pam Baker
Defendant:
Claiborne County, Tennessee, Bob Brooks, Kenneth Joseph Ochoa, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myers v. McDonough
as 3:2021cv00676
Plaintiff:
William P. Myers
Defendant:
Denis R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Barr et al
as 2:2020cv02753
Defendant:
Jermicha L. Fomby, Absolute Wireless, Robert Hartline and others
Plaintiff:
Raven Patrice Jones
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Myers et al v. Cunningham et al (TWP1)
as 4:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Myers and Clarissa Myers
Defendant:
AJ Cunningham , Charlie Wilder and Tracy City, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Turbeville v. Myers et al (PLR2)
as 3:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
Steven James Turbeville
Defendant:
Jeremy Myers, Tazewell Police Department, Marisa Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
