Cases 1 - 10 of 11
D.S. v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
D.S.
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Daniel Nickel, Jason Bunch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Harris et al v. Henry Miller Reclamation District No. 2131 et al
as 1:2021cv00882
Defendant:
Michael Cannon, Peter Cannon Michael, Henry Miller Reclamation District No. 2131 and others
Plaintiff:
Harris Farms, LP and F. Russell Harris
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
HARRIS et al v. HENRY MILLER RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 2131 et al
as 1:2021at00608
Defendant:
MICHAEL CANNON, PETER CANNON MICHAEL, HENRY MILLER RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 2131 and others
Plaintiff:
HARRIS FARMS, LP and F. RUSSELL HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PS) Whitsitt v. City of Lodi, California et al
as 2:2018cv01964
Defendant:
San Joaquin County, Pacific Tow, City of Lodi, California and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016at00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tina L O'Con v. John Katavich et al
as 1:2013cv01321
Plaintiff:
Tina L O'Con
Defendant:
John Katavich, Paul Pierce, T King-Eddington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tina L O'Con v. John Katavich et al
as 2:2013cv05620
Defendant:
John Katavich, John Katavich, T King-Eddington and others
Plaintiff:
Miss Tina L O'Con
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
