Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Thomas v. Sanders County Sheriff's Department et al
as 9:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Karl Thomas
Defendant:
Sanders County Sheriff's Department, Laurie Hines and William T. Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Flynn v. Pabst et al
as 4:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jay Flynn
Defendant:
Kirstin Pabst, Jason Marks, Michael John Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Raiser v. Gelmis et al
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Aaron Raiser
Defendant:
Susan Gelmis, Roslynn R. Mauskopf, Mary H. Murguia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rusk v. McGrath et al
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Zachary Rusk
Defendant:
Mike McGraph, Laurie McKinnon, James Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackfeet Nation v. Stapleton et al
as 4:2020cv00095
Defendant:
Dale J. Seifert, Thomas A. Kuka, County of Pondera and others
Plaintiff:
Blackfeet Nation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters et al v. The City of Colstrip et al
as 1:2019cv00077
Defendant:
The City of Colstrip, Clint Heser and Steven Williams
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Rollefson, Lorraine Waters and John Does I-XXX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClammy v. Halloran et al
as 4:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Diana McClammy
Defendant:
Thomas Halloran , Brian Tovson , Keith Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Burgan et al v. Nixon et al
as 1:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
William D. Burgan and Lynette Burgan
Defendant:
Alexander Nixon , Thomas Rieger and Carbon County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Vilsack
as 9:2015cv00061
Plaintiff:
Robert James Ellis
Defendant:
Thomas J. Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
