Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WHITE v. WISHARD HOSPITAL
as 1:2019cv03044
Plaintiff:
BRENDA L. WHITE
Defendant:
WISHARD HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOSKINS v. NEW WISHARD
as 1:2015cv00375
Plaintiff:
HOMER E. HOSKINS
Defendant:
NEW WISHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMPHRIES v. WISHARD HOSPITAL HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Defendant:
PORCHA DESS, PAM ELLIOTT, SAMIR GUPTA and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE BELL HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLIAMS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2013cv01375
Defendant:
ROBERT CARRIER, ROBERT CARRIER, V., CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
IMPD:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
LEON WILLIAMS and LOIS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS et al v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2012cv01204
Defendant:
ROBERT CARRIER, Officer HORN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
LEON WILLIAMS and LOIS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE v. VILLAVICENCIO et al
as 1:2010cv00840
Defendant:
CLARION HEALTH METHODIST, RAQUEL VILLAVICENCIO and WISHARD ADVANTAGE
Plaintiff:
KEITH MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JOHNSON v. WISHARD
as 1:2008cv01048
Plaintiff:
JULIUS JOHNSON
Defendant:
WISHARD HAND MAL PRACTICE 45,000,000 OBO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. WISHARD KNEE MAL PRACTICE $5,000,000 OBO
as 1:2008cv01049
Plaintiff:
JULIUS JOHNSON
Defendant:
WISHARD KNEE MAL PRACTICE $5,000,000 OBO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
