Cases 1 - 10 of 6,988
Doward v. City of Kettle River et al
as 0:2024cv02240
Plaintiff:
Monique Annette Doward
Defendant:
City of Kettle River, David C. Lucas, Kathryn M. Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fiorentino v. United States Government
as 0:2024cv02227
Plaintiff:
Shane Fiorentino
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Armstrong v. St. Louis County Sheriff's Dept.
as 0:2024cv02185
Plaintiff:
Seth A. Armstrong
Defendant:
St. Louis County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chamberlain v. London
as 0:2024cv02184
Plaintiff:
Dagan Chamberlain
Defendant:
Bruce London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Marks v. North Saint Paul Police Dept. et al
as 0:2024cv02170
Plaintiff:
Marisa E Marks
Defendant:
North Saint Paul Police Dept., Saint Paul Police Dept. and Roseville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
