Cases 1 - 10 of 9,565
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Arntsen v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2024cv05511
Plaintiff:
Ricky Arntsen
Defendant:
State of Washington, Clallam Bay Corrections Center, Stafford Creek Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
John Ketch LLC v. San Juan County
as 2:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
John Ketch LLC
Defendant:
San Juan County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Raikoglo v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv05494
Plaintiff:
Lance C Raikoglo
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, California Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rindal v. Inslee et al
as 2:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Rindal
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, Robert Watson Ferguson, Thomas F Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
