Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Schmidt et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Schmidt, Jimmie Lee Jarvis, Kristopher C. Goad and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, William C. Smith, William Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Conte et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Becky Crannis-Curl, Edward Gorcenski, Brian Joseph Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Balogh and Gregory Conte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conte et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2019cv00575
Defendant:
Becky Crannis-Curl, Edward Gorcenski, Brian Joseph Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Balogh and Gregory Conte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Judd v. Dixon et al
as 3:2019cv00483
Defendant:
John I. Dixon, III, Reginald Ferguson, Rashaun Boland and others
Plaintiff:
Sharee Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. Dixon et al
as 3:2019cv00482
Defendant:
John I. Dixon, III, Reginald Ferguson, Rashaun Boland and others
Plaintiff:
Sharee Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Mcadams et al
as 2:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Battle
Defendant:
Lowell Mcadams, Henry Adamson, Tishaun Ophelia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Greer v. Petersburg Bureau of Police et al
as 3:2016cv00850
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jason Greer
Defendant:
Petersburg Bureau of Police, John I. Dixon, III, Edwin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
