Cases 91 - 100 of 204
Strujan v. Glencord Building Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00629
Defendant:
Gistizia Agressivo, Richard Babinecz, Brian Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Strujan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Omar v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
Zander Omar
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Joseph Ponte, Martian J. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dixon v. Murphy et al
as 9:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dixon
Defendant:
Scott M. Murphy, Robert T. Decataldo, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorcil v. Murphy et al
as 1:2016cv07141
Plaintiff:
Patrice Dorcil
Defendant:
Judge Murphy and Lawyer David Secular
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Murphy et al
as 6:2016cv06793
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dixon
Defendant:
Scott M. Murphy, Robert T. Decataldo, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Murphy et al
as 9:2016cv01412
Plaintiff:
Robert Logan
Defendant:
G. Murphy, A. Harvey and K. Lovely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fabricio v. Lee et al
as 1:2016cv08731
Plaintiff:
Ederick Fabricio
Defendant:
W. Lee, T. Griffin, E. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Murphy
as 1:2016cv05421
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Henry
Respondent:
Martin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Kaplan et al
as 1:2016cv07223
Plaintiff:
Jessica-Maria Medina
Defendant:
Sabina Kaplan, Murphy, Wynam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defreitas v. New York State Dept. of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 2:2016cv04799
Defendant:
Area Supervisor for Parole, ADA Coordinator Brian Bradyt, ORC Ms. Hyatt and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Defreitas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
