Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 91 - 100 of 158
Marshall v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02816
Petitioner: Jermaine Cephas Marshall
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Patel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv02813
Plaintiff: Gregory Marshall
Defendant: Kruti Patel and Zeljko Vujaskovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Ebbitt
as 8:2013cv02783
Plaintiff: Gregory Marshall
Defendant: Joe Ebbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Moultrie et al
as 8:2013cv02448
Plaintiff: Gregory Marshall
Defendant: Andrew Moultrie and John Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Lynn
as 8:2013cv02042
Plaintiff: Gregory Marshall
Defendant: Matthew I. Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. USA - 2255 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01910
Petitioner: Christopher Marshall
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01618
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marshall v. Piedmont Regional Jail
as 8:2013cv01169
Plaintiff: William Frank Marshall
Defendant: Piedmont Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00671
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pitts v. Bishop et al
as 8:2013cv00530
Plaintiff: Marshall W. Pitts, Jr.
Defendant: Frank Bishop, Michael P. Thomas and James Tichnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?