Cases 91 - 100 of 229
Olmos v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03665
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Mark Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higdon #139953 v. Malachinski et al
as 2:2017cv02448
Plaintiff:
David Augustine Higdon
Defendant:
Leon Malachinski, Kyle Geelan, Tammi Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00322
Plaintiff:
Juley Scott Williams
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loving v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00304
Plaintiff:
George Thomas Loving
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez #152712 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02062
Plaintiff:
Cesar Ramirez
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health, E Baskas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Hall #290876 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01952
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Hall
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Richard Pratt, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Frank Maisano v. Karen Barcklay-Dodson, et al
as 17-16258
Plaintiff:
CARL FISHMAN and KENNETH D. MEINHARDT
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN BARCKLAY-DODSON, Medical Director Doctor, ELIJAH JORDAN, Doctor; MD, UNKNOWN JACOBSON, Deputy Warden and others
Movant - Appellant:
DALE FRANK MAISANO
Hackman #136624 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01840
Plaintiff:
Daniel Weldon Hackman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Subodh Shroff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanhope #46210 v. Corizon Health et al
as 2:2017cv01810
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Stanhope
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Charles Ryan, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
