Cases 91 - 100 of 148
Margaret Rudin v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2015cv02503
Defendant:
R. Aranas, J. G. Cox, Fergeson and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rudin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Cox, et al.,
as 2:2015cv02504
Defendant:
Adams, R. Bannister, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sanchez-Jimenez v. USA
as 2:2015cv02376
Petitioner:
Roberto Sanchez-Jimenez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Anderson v. Aranas et al
as 2:2015cv02357
Plaintiff:
Reginald Anderson
Defendant:
Romero Aranas, Jake Murphy and Franscico Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo v. Bannister et al
as 2:2015cv01362
Defendant:
R. Bruce Bannister, Gregory Cox, Francisco M. Sanchez, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
David Abbatt, Jonathan Albay, Taiwan Allen and others
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Gentry et al
as 2:2015cv01002
Defendant:
Romeo Aranan, B.B. Clark, Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denton v. State of Nevada
as 2:2015cv00868
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Sanchez Denton
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Banark v. Adams et al
as 2:2015cv00546
Defendant:
Adams, Aaron Brown, B. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Banark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2015cv00144
Defendant:
Cert Adams, Renee Baker, James Bruffy and others
Plaintiff:
Amadeo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
