Cases 91 - 100 of 150
Kholi v. A.T. Wall
as 1:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Khalil Kholi
Defendant:
A. T. Wall and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall v. Krollman et al
as 1:2013cv00717
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall
Defendant:
John C Krollman, AT Wall, Haiban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dubois v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 13-2033
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID R. DUBOIS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, A.T. WALL and RI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Rosario v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2013cv00373
Petitioner:
Evaristo Rosario
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spratt v. Wall, et al
as 13-1549
Petitioner - Appellant:
WESLEY SPRATT
Respondent - Appellee:
A.T. WALL and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Laurence, Jr. v. Wall
as 1:2013cv00128
Petitioner:
Norman Laurence, Jr.
Respondent:
Ashbel T. Wall and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Laurence, Jr. et al
as 1:2013cv00129
Petitioner:
Norman Laurence, Jr.
Respondent:
Ashbel T. Wall and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dubois v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2013cv00115
Petitioner:
David R. Dubois
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island , A. T. Wall and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spivey v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 12-2236
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE E. SPIVEY
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND and A.T. WALL
Randall v. Wall et al.
as 1:2012cv00489
Petitioner:
Charles Randall
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island, A. T. Wall and Pamela Harwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
