Cases 91 - 100 of 216
De Jesus v. Murphy et al
as 2:2016cv01647
Plaintiff:
Miguel De Jesus
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy, MD , Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Unknown et al
as 2:2016cv01613
Plaintiff:
Milton McDaniel
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. McCoy et al
as 2:2016cv01499
Plaintiff:
Treon D Vaughn
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff McCoy, Jon Mason, James Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lusk v. Verhaun et al
as 2:2016cv01425
Plaintiff:
Carl D Lusk
Defendant:
Verhaun , DeGroot, Unknown Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holifield v. Rivamonte et al
as 2:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
Al Holifield
Defendant:
Jonathan Rivamonte, Members of Milwaukee Metro Drug Enforcement Group, West Allis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castellano v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv01248
Plaintiff:
John J Castellano
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Department of Community Corrections, Michael Gollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell, Roy v. Wasserberg, Sara et al
as 3:2016cv00593
Plaintiff:
Roy Mitchell
Defendant:
Sara Wasserberg , Tina Gensler and All other responsible parties unknown unto plaintiff at this time
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonson v. Winnebago County Wisconsin et al
as 1:2016cv01018
Plaintiff:
Jason L Edmonson
Defendant:
Winnebago County Wisconsin, State of Wisconsin , Lori Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dallas v. Ginanagre et al
as 2:2016cv00859
Plaintiff:
Laponza Monroe Dallas
Defendant:
Ginanagre, Supervisor County Jail and Unknown Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory v. Underwood et al
as 2:2016cv00818
Petitioner:
Nicole C Ivory
Respondent:
Officer Underwood and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
