Cases 91 - 100 of 239
Anderson v. Gittere
as 3:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Arnold Anderson
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Thomas Richardson
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keck v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
William Keck
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Gittere
as 2:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Arnold Anderson
Defendant:
William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Barry Harris
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, NDOC and B. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borden v. Gitter
as 3:2021cv00521
Petitioner:
Fredrick Douglas Borden
Respondent:
William Gitter and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Barry Harris
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, Bowdimer, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Exxum et al
as 3:2021cv00506
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
Doctor Exxum, Doctor Michael Hanf, Nurse Melissa Kington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altheide v. Gittere et al
as 3:2021cv00496
Plaintiff:
Jason Altheide
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, William Reubart, Sandoval Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venegas v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00437
Plaintiff:
Joseph Venegas
Defendant:
Nevada Dept. of Corrections, Warden William Gittere, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
