Cases 91 - 100 of 614
Byrd v. Tang et al
as 4:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Noland Roosevelt Byrd and Sovereign Living Justice Mustafa El Shabazz Bey
Defendant:
Lisa Bronchetti, Greg Willis, Alyse Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willis v. Villegas et al
as 4:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Fransico Villegas, U.T.M.B. ADS Estelle Unit, U.S. Postal Services, Walker County and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Plano Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Noland Roosevelt Byrd and Mustafa El Shabazz Bey, Free Sovereign Moorish American
Defendant:
Lisa Bronchetti, Plano Police Department, Greg Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. Mr. S. Ma'at, et al et al
as 5:2021cv00014
Respondent:
Ms.R Doyle, Mr. S. Ma'at, et al, Mr. T Charter and others
Petitioner:
Victor C Vargas
Defendant:
Udelhoven Oilfield System Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv00369
Petitioner:
Leonard Farrell Willis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliver v. Collier et al
as 2:2020cv00272
Plaintiff:
Willie Keith Oliver
Defendant:
NFN Perez, Oscar Mendoza, NFN Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2020cv00366
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Oliver v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2020cv00238
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Willie Keith Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schwarzer v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2020cv00207
Defendant:
Charles C. Hudnall, Shemika T. Jackson, B. Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Cliff Schwarzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2020cv00191
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Tommy Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
