Cases 101 - 110 of 251
Tyrone Beaty v. Warden Leroy Cartledge
as 16-6587
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYRONE BEATY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE
Respondent:
ALAN WILSON
Tyson v. Wilson
as 6:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson
Defendant:
Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alcantara v. Wilson
as 7:2016cv01065
Plaintiff:
Milciades Alcantara
Defendant:
Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony L. Mattison v. Warden Larry Cartledge
as 16-6450
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. MATTISON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Respondent:
ALAN WILSON
Charles Tyson v. Alan Wilson
as 16-6326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TYSON, a/k/a Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN WILSON
Corder v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 2:2016cv00401
Plaintiff:
Yohanan Corder
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Alan Wilson and Scarlett A Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Howell v. Alan Wilson
as 16-6111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK L. HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN WILSON, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina
Michael A. Dukes, Sr. v. State of South Carolina
as 15-8038
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHEL ANDRE DUKES, a/k/a Michel Andre Dukes
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, WILLIE L. EAGLETON, JOSHUA L. THOMAS, Assistant Attorney General and others
Ikeef Brailsford v. Warden Willie Eagleton
as 15-7925
Petitioner - Appellant:
IKEEF BRAILSFORD
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Evans C I
Respondent:
ALAN WILSON, Attorney General of SC
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sara Weiss
as 15-2458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
