Cases 101 - 110 of 677
THURMAN v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
JAVIER SAVIONNE THURMAN
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, C. HOLCOMB, KEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2022cv01296
Petitioner:
AUSTIN B WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burress v. Taylor et al
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Arliss B Burress
Defendant:
Stephanie Taylor and Probation Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Vantuinen et al
as 3:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Eberaia D Fields and Eberaia Fields
Defendant:
Alec S Vantuinen, Beebout and B Funk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEACHER v. PIMENTELL et al
as 1:2022cv01183
Plaintiff:
R. PEACHER
Defendant:
B. PIMENTELL and JAMIE DOWNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEABROOKS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, et al
as 2:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
KEREL L. SEABROOKS
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, CENTURION OF INDIANA, LLC, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
Walter B White, Jr
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Jason Nowatski, Rob Wright and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULK v. GLASSBURN et al
as 2:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS M. FULK
Defendant:
JASE GLASSBURN and PAUL B. HARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSE v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ROSE
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., JACK HENDRIX, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Myers et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jerry Chambers
Defendant:
B Myers, Ms Myers and Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
