Cases 101 - 110 of 264
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv01416
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Defendant:
OSP Supt. Brandon Kelly, Dir. Colette Peters, Gov. Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair v. Blewett et al
as 2:2020cv01397
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen Sinclair
Defendant:
Stuart Young, Dennis Holmes, Chaplain Hodney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Blewett et al
as 2:2020cv01338
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Ross
Defendant:
Shawn Haywood, Ken Jeske, Captain Rumsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall et al v. Brown
as 1:2020cv01144
Plaintiff:
George Lee Marshall, Charles Lee Almas and Lance Scott Wolters
Defendant:
Steve Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacDonald et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv00931
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Novascone, Bryan Alexander MacDonald and Thomas L. Retallick
Defendant:
Clint Riley, Kate Brown, Clifton G. Harold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neil-Barrett v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv00928
Defendant:
J. Sanchez, Bev Clarno, Kate Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Liam O'Neil-Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Brown
as 6:2020cv00766
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
Lisa Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clardy et al v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2020cv00744
Plaintiff:
Alexis Gonzalez, Unnamed Multnomah County Inmates, Adonis Thompson and others
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, Michael Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steltz v. Weiner et al
as 2:2020cv00658
Plaintiff:
Adam Troy Steltz
Defendant:
Zack Mazer, John Weiner, Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lane County Adult Correction Facility et al
as 6:2020cv00639
Defendant:
Lane County Mental Health, Welpath Medical Agency and Lane County Adult Correction Facility
Plaintiff:
Anthony Edward Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
