Cases 101 - 110 of 1,115
PARROTTE v. ABRAHAM, ET AL
as 2:2020cv01980
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN VICTOR PARROTTE
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, DETECTIVE JEFFREY J. ABRAHAM and DETECTIVE BRIAN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NORTHINGTON v. PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv06338
Defendant:
OFFICER JEFFREY GALAZKA, OFFICER BROWN, OFFICER RICHARD NICOLETTI and others
Plaintiff:
JAMEL NORTHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv06200
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, THE UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GRANT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00338
Defendant:
PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT RILEY, WENDY PAYNE, ASHLEY CHIOCCO and others
Plaintiff:
DENISE L. GRANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LOPEZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01781
Defendant:
MARTIN F. HORN, JEFFREY A. BEARD and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
GEORGE I. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fudge v. Marsh et al
as 4:2020cv02112
Defendant:
Dr. Jeffrey Boland, John Doe(s), John Doe(s) Correctional Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Dolphus Otis Fudge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCURI et al v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2020cv05408
Defendant:
SEAN GORMAN, TIARE NIMMO-LEE, YOUNGSHIL DUNBAR and others
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J ARCURI and MELANIE ARCURI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRING v. FAYETTE COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2020cv01559
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY PRISON, SGT Myers, Warden JEFFREY MYERS and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LEE HERRING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VASQUEZ v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2020cv05116
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, JEFFREY SMITH, CHRISTIAN LEINBACH and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOYE v. MANNING
as 2:2020cv01437
Defendant:
JUDGE JEFFREY MANNING
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
