Cases 101 - 110 of 170
Buchhold v. Dooley et al
as 5:2014cv05003
Petitioner:
Ralph Buchhold
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Siers et al v. Young et al
as 4:2014cv04007
Petitioner:
Donovan Siers
Respondent:
Robert Dooley, Darin Young, Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dale v. Dooley et al
as 4:2014cv04003
Plaintiff:
James I. Dale
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Jennifer Wagner, George Deglman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean Cochrun v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 14-1003
Petitioner - Appellant:
Dean Cochrun, Next Friend Larry Dean Cochrun
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Warden and Marty J. Jackley
Scheetz v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2013cv04144
Plaintiff:
Daryl Scheetz
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darren Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kessel v. Dooley et al
as 6:2013cv00052
Petitioner:
John Kessel
Respondent:
Robert Dooley, Montana Department of Corrections, Montana Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Litschewski v. Dooley et al
as 1:2013cv01013
Petitioner:
Richard Litschewski
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochrun v. Dooley et al
as 4:2013cv04065
Petitioner:
Dean Cochrun
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel R. Dalrymple, et al v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 13-1204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel R. Dalrymple and Leslie W. White, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison, SCO Jackson, Correctional Officer, Sgt. Dykstra, Correctional Officer and others
Briley v. Dooley et al
as 4:2012cv04210
Plaintiff:
Liberty Cash Briley
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Major Tjerdsma, Tammy Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
