Cases 101 - 110 of 1,280
Williams #757359 et al v. Huss et al
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Williams #757359 and Robert D. Simpson #380661
Defendant:
Erica Huss, Doug Tasson, Tim Dahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina-Rodriguez #957537 v. Crompton
as 1:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
James William Medina-Rodriguez #957537
Defendant:
Unknown Crompton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassaday v. Mendham
as 1:2022cv00951
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Kevin William Cassaday
Respondent:
Maarten Vermaat and Bob Mendham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Talley-Ellis v. S.A.S Automotive Inc. ET. et al
as 2:2022cv12231
Plaintiff:
Wilshawn Talley-Ellis
Defendant:
S.A.S Automotive Inc. ET., S.A.S Security Inc. ET., William Hooks, Jr. and others
Little v. Christiansen et al
as 4:2022cv12222
Plaintiff:
Dartagnan Little
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Christiansen, K. Williams, D. Beauregard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #336843 v. Tomaszczyk et al
as 1:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Leonard Williams #336843
Defendant:
Michael Tomaszczyk, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassaday v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 1:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Kevin William Cassaday
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Trevor Sherman, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassaday v. Mendham
as 1:2022cv00840
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Kevin William Cassaday
Respondent:
Bob Mendham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Little #197553 v. Christiansen et al
as 1:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
Dartagnan Little #197553
Defendant:
J. Christiansen, K. Williams, D. Beauregard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
