Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 101 - 110 of 29,053
Spirdione #947841 v. Wood
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff: Nicholas Alan Spirdione #947841
Defendant: Rebecca Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worden v. Gearland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv11191
Plaintiff: Marc David Worden
Defendant: Glenn Gearland, T. Blain, Gary Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. King et al
as 2:2024cv11176
Petitioner: Carli Carpenter
Respondent: C. King, Kym Worthy, Patricia Penman and others
Stead v. Morrison
as 2:2024cv11183
Petitioner: Michael Stead
Respondent: Warden John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Caldwell v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv11178
Plaintiff: Ramon Lovell Caldwell
Defendant: Ryan, Mikat, Moriarty and others
Davis v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00458
Petitioner: Justin Demetrius Davis
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ford #181879 v. Morrison et al
as 1:2024cv00459
Plaintiff: Kenneth Ford #181879
Defendant: Bryan Morrison, Heidi Washington and Christine Bolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragan #314744 v. Wellpath et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff: Benjamin Ragan #314744
Defendant: Wellpath Medical Provider, Sarah Riley, Michael Travis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alward v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff: Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pearson v. Washington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv11179
Petitioner: Andre DeShawn Pearson
Respondent: Michigan, People of the State of and Raphael Washington

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?