Cases 101 - 110 of 50,219
HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
BOBBIE HENDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN, FCI & FCP MCKEAN and CMC ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
STOCKTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN and ROSS P. BUSCEMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY and SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MURRAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEON LUBIEJEWSKI, JAMES MCNESBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE QUINZEL KK CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL KK CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN V. COMM OF PA
as 5:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
PAUL COHEN
Defendant:
COMM OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
BRANDON T. EVANS, JENNA MARIE PLISZAR, KEVIN SAMUEL SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIDDINGS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
LEVI GIDDINGS
Defendant:
M. J. ZAKEN, S. BUZAS, MR. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Burr v. Warden of SCI-Greene et al
as 1:2024cv00759
Petitioner:
Dwain Burr
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Greene and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Nicholas et al
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant:
Warden Nicholas, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Mrs. Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
