Cases 111 - 120 of 574
Mayo v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv00965
Defendant:
Dorine Varner, Carole Mattis, Robeciewski and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Alonzo Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez-DeJesus v. Mild et al
as 3:2019cv00882
Defendant:
Blanche Mild, Biscoe, Dorina Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Ramos Gonzalez-DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ocampo v. Noel et al
as 3:2019cv00091
Defendant:
William H Dreibelbis, Paul Noel, Dr. Patel and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ocampo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. PAUP et al
as 2:2019cv00280
Defendant:
RACQUEL, KATAYOUN COPELAND, JOHN HOSIER and others
Plaintiff:
ANWAR SHARIF ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NDAULA v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00028
Respondent:
United States Attorney For The Western District Of Pennsylvania, H. Quay, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Alexander Ndaula
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANDERS v. MARLER et al
as 2:2018cv05477
Defendant:
R. SMITH, SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE SECTION/SERVICES (S.I.S.) DEPT. AND STAFF, WARDEN SEAN MARLER and others
Plaintiff:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINTON v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2019cv00324
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, CO. PAWLICKI, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD v. SACHS et al
as 2:2018cv01582
Defendant:
JUDGE EDWARD J. BORKOWSKI, SCOTT H. SCHRICKER, A.D.A. LAWRENCE ELLIOT SACHS and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TARIQ SHARIF ALI BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WASHINGTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01390
Defendant:
C.O. STEFFIN, SGT. CHESMER, LT. JELLOT and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
