Cases 111 - 120 of 872
Harbin v. Ozmint
as 6:2009cv02790
Petitioner:
Kevin L Harbin
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grobusky v. Ozmint et al
as 0:2009cv02759
Petitioner:
John Thomas Grobusky
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint and SCDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Porter et al
as 3:2009cv02697
Plaintiff:
Cedric E Jenkins
Defendant:
Sylvia Porter, R H Mauney, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pelzer v. Cartledge et al
as 2:2009cv02259
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pelzer
Defendant:
Leroy Cartledge, T Holiday, McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pelzer v. Cartledge et al
as 2:2009cv02559
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pelzer
Defendant:
Leroy Cartledge, T Holiday, McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Joyner v. Ozmint et al
as 3:2009cv02524
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Anthony Joyner
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Willie L Eagleton, Annie Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Corbett v. Ozmint et al
as 9:2009cv02494
Plaintiff:
James Corbett
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, David Tatarsky, Rob Peele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ferola v. Thompson et al
as 9:2009cv02435
Plaintiff:
Michael J Ferola
Defendant:
Captain Thompson, Captain Ferguson, Captain Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Purnell v. Ozmint
as 3:2009cv02424
Petitioner:
Kim Purnell
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hendrix v. Ozmint
as 3:2009cv02275
Petitioner:
Calvin Hendrix
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
