Cases 111 - 120 of 169
MIDDLETON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC
as 2:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
JASON M. MIDDLETON
Defendant:
WEXFORD "MEDICAL PROVIDER" and WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Byrd et al
as 3:2019cv00507
Defendant:
Byrd, Wexford (?) Medical, Michael Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Michael K Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARTLOW v. BROWN et al
as 1:2019cv02525
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, RICHARD BROWN, R.D.C. MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv02346
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, AGNES A. OPOKU, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv00456
Plaintiff:
Manuel Tyrone Miles
Defendant:
Wexford Medical, Ron Neal, B Dorre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00447
Plaintiff:
Charles Willis Ingram
Defendant:
Agnes A Opoku, Willson, Knight and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. WEXFORD MEDICAL et al
as 1:2019cv01964
Plaintiff:
WINFIELD COOPER
Defendant:
RDC MEDICAL STAFF, WEXFORD MEDICAL and MEDICAL STAFF OF NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv00331
Defendant:
Lt McNeal, Wexford Medical, A Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Cody W Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. WEXFORD MEDICAL GROUP ET AL
as 1:2019cv01583
Defendant:
HANDLEY, E. GILBERT, HEATHER DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SAVAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodd v. Wexford Medical Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Inc, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Richard Dodd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
