Cases 121 - 130 of 158
Kelly v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv01101
Petitioner:
Dwayne Kelly
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Mitcheff
as 3:2013cv00924
Plaintiff:
Richard Larry Kelly
Defendant:
Mike Mitcheff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SKAGGS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2013cv00273
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
KELLY SKAGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00635
Defendant:
JENIFER ADAMS, BILLY ALLAN, AMES and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dyson v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Zar Dontay Dyson
Defendant:
David Gilbert, Andrew Renbarger, Rob Ricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Allen County Sheriff et al
as 1:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kelli Russell
Defendant:
Allen County Sheriff and John/Jane Doe Allen County Jail Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cummins et al
as 3:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joel Williams, Jr
Defendant:
J A Cummins, Greg Ellison, Mark R McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2012cv01740
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, BONNETTA DEWEESE and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00807
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
KELLY S. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HANKINS v. CUMMINS et al
as 1:2012cv00683
Defendant:
NURSE ANGIE, NURSE MICHELLE, NURSE NANCY and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHON MICHAEL HANKINS
MR:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
MRS:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
