Cases 121 - 130 of 210
Corey Wells v. Robert Houston
as 10-1566
Petitioner - Appellant:
Corey Wells
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director of Corrections
Randy Harms v. Robert Houston
as 10-1555
Petitioner - Appellant:
Randy R. Harms
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston
Jeffrey Morris v. Robert Houston
as 10-1540
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jeffrey L. Morris
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston
Strider Rognirhar v. Kurt Kinlund, et al
as 10-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Strider Rognirhar, also known as Jonathan Picollo
Defendant - Appellee:
Kurt Kinlund, In His Individual Capacity as Employee of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Richard Cruickshank, In His Individual Capacity as Employee of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Dennis Bakewell, In His Individual Capacity as Employee of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and others
Terrell Henderson v. Robert Houston
as 10-1131
Petitioner - Appellant:
Terrell Henderson
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director State of Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and Nebraska Attorney General
Luis Monje v. Robert Houston
as 09-3707
Petitioner - Appellant:
Luis Monje
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston
Michael Sims v. Robert Houston
as 09-3628
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Joseph Sims
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director
Henry Patterson, Jr. v. Robert Houston, et al
as 09-3365
Petitioner - Appellant:
Henry E. Patterson, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director of Nebraska Department of Corrections and Jon Bruning, Attorney General
Turner v. Houston
as 8:2009cv00351
Petitioner:
David Jose Turner
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stark v. Houston
as 8:2009cv00338
Petitioner:
Dennis Stark
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
