Cases 121 - 130 of 650
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02391
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY, WORLD BANK and others
Plaintiff:
SOCIETY OF T.R.U.T.H. and JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02385
Defendant:
U.S. MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, NATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv02191
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CARLOS PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PADILLA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv02051
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL PADILLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GULLETT v. DUFF et al
as 1:2019cv02015
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, JAMES C. DUFF, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
TAQUAN GULLETT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
LARIVE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01932
Plaintiff:
JAMES EUGENE LARIVE, JR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTLETON v. MNUCHIN et al
as 1:2019cv01893
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STEVEN T. MNUCHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CASEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01852
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DRIEVER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv01807
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ALL FBOP DIRECTORS OF PSYCHOLOGY SERVICES-NATIONWIDE, UNKNOWN PRISON EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE DRIEVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01365
Plaintiff:
NICK R. SMITH, HRM KING NICODEMUS and NICKI RAY SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
