Cases 121 - 130 of 825
Williams v. King
as 3:2020cv00287
Petitioner:
Dillion Williams
Respondent:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bogan v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00284
Petitioner:
Jerry Anthony Bogan
Respondent:
Jessie Williams and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mhoon v. Turner et al
as 4:2020cv00183
Plaintiff:
James Mhoon
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Lee Simon, M. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Atencio v. Barr et al
as 5:2020cv00192
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, William Joyce, Shawn Gillis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Luis David Moreno Atencio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simpson v. William et al
as 1:2020cv00315
Defendant:
Wormeley Charles, C.O. # 130, C.O. # 312 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Keith Denzell Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Perry et al
as 1:2020cv00302
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Gloria Perry, William T. Braizer, Angela Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Demario Dontez Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lee County
as 1:2020cv00194
Plaintiff:
Matthew Williams
Defendant:
Lee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bass v. Cain et al
as 3:2020cv00260
Respondent:
Lynn Fitch, Nathan "Burl" Cain and Jesse Williams
Petitioner:
Cortez Deontae Bass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Forrest County Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Lt. Dale Bounds, Officer Harry Crockett, Forrest County Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morris Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bryant et al
as 1:2020cv00286
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams and Merlin Kent Williams
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Phil Bryant
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
