Cases 131 - 140 of 446
COLEMAN v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2014cv01683
Petitioner:
PATRICK COLEMAN
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RIECO v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE RIECO
Defendant:
BRIAN COLEMAN, SAVAADRE, GALLUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2014cv00415
Petitioner:
Lamar Coleman
Respondent:
United State's Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zimmerman v. Coleman et al
as 3:2014cv00313
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L Zimmerman
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YUNIK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
JAY V. YUNIK
Defendant:
JOHN C. WETZEL, DEBRA RAND, MICHAEL TKACS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ZUSCHLAG v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2014cv00038
Petitioner:
WILLIAM S. ZUSCHLAG
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FULTON v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv00753
Petitioner:
OMAR FULTON
Respondent:
BRAIN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
JAMIL SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, R. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. COLEMAN
as 2:2014cv00074
Petitioner:
ANTONIO LAMONT GREEN
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURNAM v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv00035
Petitioner:
JEROME BURNAM
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
