Cases 131 - 140 of 5,430
Cisneros v. Davis
as 1:2016cv00672
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Morales Cisneros
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisneros v. Davis
as 1:2016cv00674
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Morales Cisneros
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and William Stephens
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loper v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv01508
Petitioner:
Kurt Wayne Loper
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruffin v. Stephens et al
as 6:2016cv00162
Defendant:
FNU Adams, Bruce Armstrong, B. Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Stephens et al
as 6:2016cv00485
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Robinson
Defendant:
William Stephens, Debbie Rinehart and Gurney Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00652
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Darrell J. Harper
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2016cv00104
Petitioner:
Mozelle King James
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garza v. Stephens
as 6:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
Rosfel Garza
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ibukun Washington v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10787
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ibukun Olowa Washington
Respondent / Appellee:
William Stephens, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tubbs v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2016cv00059
Petitioner:
Freddie Lee Tubbs
Respondent:
William Stephens and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
