Cases 131 - 140 of 30,411
SCHWARTZ v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN and CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANNA v. YARBER et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN HANNA
Defendant:
YARBER, IVEY, RAMBIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Ronell L Roberts
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EASLEY-EL v. WARGNY et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Defendant:
CHLOE WARGNY and JOHN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young-El v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Young-El and Jermaine Young
Defendant:
Oliver and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIRBY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00500
Petitioner:
CHARLES KIRBY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOD v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
DERRICK HOOD, JR.
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00740
Petitioner:
DAVID GEAN COVINGTON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
