Cases 141 - 150 of 803
Armstrong, Jr. v. Carvajal et al
as 3:2021cv01602
Petitioner:
James Bernard Armstrong, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael J. Carvajal, Scott Finley and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cascella v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jon Cascella
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr. C. Schmidt, Ph.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cosme-Torres v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2021cv01480
Petitioner:
Jesus Cosme-Torres
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thatcher v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv01372
Petitioner:
Joaquin Thatcher
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden of FPC-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03535
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baez-Garcia v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv01355
Plaintiff:
David Baez-Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America, R. Kresock, Capt. Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERNELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv03344
Plaintiff:
ARYA MILAN PERNELL and AARON MICHAEL PERNELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTT v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Petitioner:
OMAR BUTT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN V. MOSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ball v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv01228
Plaintiff:
Reginald Keith Ball
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Officer Munchler, Ms. McNaughty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez-Francisco v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01179
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Francisco
Respondent:
B. Thompson, Herman Quay, III and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
