Cases 141 - 150 of 4,454
Spotted Elk v. Core Civic et al
as 4:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Abraham Spotted Elk
Defendant:
Core Civic, John and Jane Doe, Shareholders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montano v. USA
as 1:2023cv00115
Petitioner:
Nicholas John Montano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Zindell v. Salmonsen
as 4:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Gregg Allen Zindell
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spotted Elk v. Core Civic et al
as 9:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Abraham Spotted Elk
Defendant:
Core Civic, John and Jane Doe, Shareholders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schroeder v. USA
as 2:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Joshua Jay Schroeder
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hobbs v. Valley
as 9:2023cv00117
Petitioner:
Dennis J. Hobbs
Respondent:
Randy Valley and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sconce v. Hogan et al
as 9:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
David Wayne Sconce
Respondent:
Brian Hogan and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chesterman v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00117
Petitioner:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rondeaux v. County of Yellowstone et al
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
William J. Rondeaux
Defendant:
County of Yellowstone and Scott Twito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey v. Montana Supreme Court
as 9:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Tracey Godfrey
Defendant:
Montana Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
