Cases 141 - 150 of 10,868
Purdy v. Harpe
as 5:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Aaron C Purdy
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Grady County Medical
as 5:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Johnson
Defendant:
Grady County Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyers v. Cleveland County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant:
Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. County of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Keith-Dewane Hopper
Defendant:
County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado, S Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sturm v. Goldey et al
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Karl Jacob Sturm
Defendant:
FNU Goldey, FNU Bouche, FNU Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prichard v. Mullet et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Jim Mullet, James Richardson, Garvin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tony Kent Blake
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Parks, Choctaw County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiger v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Sam D Tiger
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Turley
as 5:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Dermond C Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Terri Turley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gravlee v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee and John Kennedy
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Garfield County Authority, Oklahoma Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
