Cases 151 - 160 of 803
KAETZ v. BUREAU OF PRISONS FEDERAL PRISON BUREAU et al
as 2:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
ORLANDO L. HARPER, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, BUREAU OF PRISONS FEDERAL PRISON BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv01038
Defendant:
S.O.S. Officer Jane Doe, S.O.S. Officer Rollison, A.W. Eckhart and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Quay et al
as 1:2021cv00988
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden H. Quay
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Thompson et al
as 3:2021cv00919
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and R. Thompson
Petitioner:
Kevin Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PERRUCCI v. NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv02342
Defendant:
NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
ANGELO M. PERRUCCI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. U.S. Marshals Judiciary Security Division et al
as 1:2021cv00890
Respondent:
New York Times, U.S. Department of Justice, Fox News and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv00840
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden M. Thompson
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00807
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, M. Thompson and Designation & Computation Center
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Royer et al
as 1:2021cv00777
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Lt. A. Stover, Federal Bureau of Prisons, M. Royer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2021cv00761
Respondent:
Dr. Julin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
