Cases 151 - 160 of 1,115
GANT v. MARLER et al
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
JEFFREY NASH, MICHAEL W. CARROLL, MRS. KNOX and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH GANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv00030
Petitioner:
JEFFREY PALMER
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2018cv05312
Defendant:
WARDEN J. QUIGLEY, DEPUTY WARDEN SMITH, ICC JESSICA COLLINS and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD v. SACHS et al
as 2:2018cv01582
Defendant:
JUDGE EDWARD J. BORKOWSKI, SCOTT H. SCHRICKER, A.D.A. LAWRENCE ELLIOT SACHS and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TARIQ SHARIF ALI BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KEYES BROWN MOORE et al v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL
as 5:2018cv04745
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY JAIL, WARDEN-JANINE QUIGLEY, DEPUTY WARDEN-JEFFREY SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE S. KEYES BROWN MOORE and NILSA LOPEZ-SAUREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETTAWAY v. WOLF et al
as 1:2018cv00306
Defendant:
HEARING EXAMINER SZELEWSLI, SGT. MACKINTOSH, BRYAN E. FLINCHBAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Guzman v. USA
as 3:2018cv01808
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bell v. Haines et al
as 3:2018cv01746
Defendant:
Jeffrey Koch, Scott Klinefelter, Chadwick Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Montana Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMM v. SCHMEHL et al
as 2:2018cv03093
Respondent:
JUDGE DITTER, MARK CAPOZZA and JUDGE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
Petitioner:
ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JUSTE v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00922
Petitioner:
ANDRE JUSTE
Respondent:
THOMAS FORLEY, JEFFREY SESSIONS and SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Defendant:
WARDEN OF IMMIGRATION DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
