Cases 161 - 170 of 780
Simoneaux v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Richard Simoneaux
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald King, Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. MDOC et al
as 3:2013cv00323
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Prather
Defendant:
MDOC, Medical Department, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simoneaux v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00531
Plaintiff:
Richard Simoneaux
Defendant:
Christopher Epps , Ronald King , Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollie Evans v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 13-60355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, Official position and Commissioner, MRS. ANITA JOHNSON, MRS. UNKNOWN WASHINGTON, Official position and others
Williams v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Emmitt L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. GEO Group et al
as 4:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Prather
Defendant:
GEO Group, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bass
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerome Wall v. David Walker, et al
as 13-60314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WALKER, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and RICHARD PENNINGTON
Moore v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Richard Moore
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Brand Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaskin v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Gaskin
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Woodall and Woodland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
