Cases 161 - 170 of 30,411
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARSHALL A.K.A. DEEZ NUTZ
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, KELCY PENNINGTON and COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Megan
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Baker
Defendant:
Megan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATT v. USA
as 4:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CLARK v. PLATT et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. CLARK, II
Defendant:
CHAD PLATT, KEITH HARTZELL, PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STACY v. TEMPLE et al
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD STACY
Defendant:
DYLAN TEMPLE, TEMPLE, SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Elkhart County Work Release et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Tervarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Work Release, Board of Directors, Helfan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCHANAN v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
GERALD BUCHANAN
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
