Cases 161 - 170 of 5,669
Jokhoo v. Wohlman et al
as 0:2023cv03022
Petitioner:
Khemall Jokhoo
Respondent:
Ned G. Wohlman, Kendall James, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McIntosh v. Gallion et al
as 0:2023cv03149
Plaintiff:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Defendant:
Lt. Gallion, Captain Hess, Warden Jared Rardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ista v. Washington County et al
as 0:2023cv02867
Plaintiff:
Jason Carl Ista
Defendant:
Washington County, Washington County Sheriff's Department, Dan Starry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinkenbeard v. King
as 0:2023cv03151
Petitioner:
Robert Clinkenbeard
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chauvin v. USA
as 0:2023cv03512
Petitioner:
Derek Michael Chauvin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jama v. Peters et al
as 0:2023cv03075
Plaintiff:
Muna Jama
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian, Warden Michael Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stamps v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Alessandra Katie Stamps
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02866
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arnold v. Brott
as 0:2023cv02805
Petitioner:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Respondent:
Joel Brott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02806
Petitioner:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
