Cases 171 - 180 of 5,669
Martinez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03178
Petitioner:
Francisco Martinez
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McIntosh v. Peters et al
as 0:2023cv03150
Plaintiff:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Defendant:
Collette S Peters, Central Office Religious Director for the Federal Bureau of Prisons and Central Office Director of Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03227
Petitioner:
Howard Young
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holmes v. Centurion of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
Centurion of Minnesota, MN DOC, State of MN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tizoc v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv02819
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Tizoc
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02712
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02708
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02718
Petitioner:
Christopher J Gonzalez
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lokken v. Warden Lino Lakes et al
as 0:2023cv02714
Petitioner:
Shawn Duane Lokken
Respondent:
Warden Lino Lakes and DOC Lino-Lakes Prizon Medical Department/ Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Block v. United States
as 0:2023cv02873
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
