Cases 181 - 190 of 5,669
Purdy v. James et al
as 0:2023cv03148
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Colin Purdy
Respondent:
Kendal James, Ned G. Wohlman and Jordan DePonty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
David J. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jared Rardin, Dr. Elaine York and A. Herzog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. USA
as 0:2023cv03326
Petitioner:
Chris Maurice Welch
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hunter v. USA
as 0:2023cv03323
Petitioner:
Paris La Monte Hunter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Friday v. Peters et al
as 0:2023cv02870
Plaintiff:
Cleone Cecelia Friday
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian, Michael Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02681
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv03299
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, Nicole Boder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seamon v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2023cv03302
Plaintiff:
Leonard-Deron Seamon
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntosh v. Williams
as 0:2023cv02695
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
