Cases 11 - 20 of 376
Quirk v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Devin John Quirk
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Maldonado, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Morris Moore, Jr
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
D.O.C., Jennifer Reis, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Gardner et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Hill
Defendant:
Gardner, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oh v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Bamm Oh
Defendant:
Quiros, Jane Doe, Mike T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Tyrick Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crispin v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Jossean Crispin
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, D.M.H.A.S. Police, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosegreen v. Lloyd et al
as 3:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Lamont Rosegreen
Defendant:
Lloyd, Curney, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Coleman v. Charles et al
as 3:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Coleman
Defendant:
Sandra Charles, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
