Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Johnson v. Kariko et al
as 3:2020cv05514
Defendant:
Jonathan Neau, Pamely Saari, John Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earle Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ziegler et al v. Correctional Industries et al
as 3:2020cv05288
Defendant:
Susan Pierini, David Edwards, Scott Light and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ziegler, Alvin Hegge and Jeffrey Scott Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. State of Washington Attorney General et al
as 2:2019cv01413
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of Washington Attorney General, Kenneth Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Richard H Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckard v. Stringham et al
as 2:2018cv00898
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Eckard
Defendant:
Jeff Stringham, John Vandenberg, Joan Jaeger, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troupe vs. Morrow, et al.
as 4:2018cv05041
Plaintiff:
David Troupe
Defendant:
Lisa Morrow, Torin Mitchel, Rutlage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Roberts et al
as 2:2017cv01883
Petitioner:
Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent:
Sarah M. Roberts and Dan Satterberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Satterberg et al
as 2:2017cv01705
Petitioner:
Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent:
Sarah Marion Roberts and Daniel Satterberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Roberts et al
as 2:2016cv00747
Petitioner:
Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent:
Sarah Marion Roberts and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniels v. Stewart et al
as 3:2015cv05943
Plaintiff:
Peter J. McDaniels
Defendant:
Belinda Stewart, Bernard Warner, Earl Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rich v. Mulloy et al
as 2:2013cv01147
Plaintiff:
Milton Rich
Defendant:
Sarah Mulloy , Landon Steiger and Nam Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
