Cases 11 - 20 of 32,460
Rutherford v. Haynes
as 7:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rutherford
Defendant:
Dr. Greg Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmuhl v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00375
Petitioner:
Andrew Gilbert Schmuhl
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Lawrence E. Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ortiz-Carrasquillo v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
Giovanni Janick Ortiz-Carrasquillo and Giovanni Janick Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Falkowski v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Falkowski
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Defendant:
Lt. R. Vaughn, Sgt. Andrews, Ofc. Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquis v. Taylor
as 7:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
DeVonte Davis Marquis
Defendant:
A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Keller
as 7:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Demosthenese A. Wesley
Defendant:
Officer A.W. Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. District 39 Probation Office et al
as 7:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Eugene Junior Kimble
Defendant:
District 39 Probation Office, Harrisonburg Circuit Courts and Harrisonburg Commonwealth Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
