Cases 11 - 20 of 30
RUTHEFORD v. A. et al
as 1:2019cv03005
Defendant:
TAMERA SMITH, YVONNE A. and YOKO SAVINO
Plaintiff:
HEATH RUTHEFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Redman et al
as 3:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, Stephanie Mill, St. Joseph County Sheriff's Department and others
Estate Plaintiff:
Jane Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLER v. WATSON
as 2:2018cv00550
Petitioner:
NAKIA HEATH KELLER
Respondent:
T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WEATHERHOLT v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00078
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
HEATH WEATHERHOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEATH v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00050
Petitioner:
FREDERICK J. HEATH
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEATH v. VANZEE et al
as 1:2017cv00467
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN, CONWAY, BARBARA CRAWFORD and others
Plaintiff:
TROY M. HEATH, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. OFFICER BURNS et al
as 3:2016cv00250
Defendant:
BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF BLOOMINGTON INDIANA, OFFICER BURNS and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
HEATH CARL FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAYLESS v. EWING et al
as 2:2016cv00306
Defendant:
CANTEEN SERVICES, GREG EWING and VIGO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Plaintiff:
DAVID HEATH GRAYLESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justus v. Fort Wayne et al
as 1:2015cv00383
Plaintiff:
Robert Justus
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne, Jeff Ripley, Ben Springer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2015cv00053
Defendant:
SAMUEL BEARD, DENISE BROOKS, SCOTT CONLEN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HEATH KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
