Cases 11 - 20 of 127
Baker v. Hamilton
as 7:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Lauren Markee Baker
Defendant:
Sgt. Travis Hamilton, Cpt. Tommy Bobbitt, Lt. Col. Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick v. Barton et al
as 7:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Lt. Douglas Barton, Unit Manager Larry Collins, C/O C. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Dye, R. Bishop, S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Ann et al
as 7:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wesley Eugene Baker, II
Defendant:
Counslor Ann and Doctor Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Bonner et al
as 7:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Wesley Eugene Baker
Defendant:
Corpral Bonner, Officer Weston, Major Enoch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Collins et al
as 7:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter
Defendant:
Larry Ross Collins, D. Barton, C.C. Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Streeval, A.W. Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baker v. Clark et al
as 3:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
Alterik J. Baker
Defendant:
Megan L. Clark, Michael J. Hallahan, II and Preston G. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. City of Lynchburg Police et al
as 7:2021cv00489
Plaintiff:
Wesley Eugene Baker, II
Defendant:
City of Lynchburg Police and City of Lynchburg Fire & Rescue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
Malik Allen
Defendant:
Williams, Ms. Burrell and J. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
