Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Benoman v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00742
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Benoman
Defendant:
Lisa Howell, State of Mississippi, Marcus D. Evans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Management and Training Corp. et al
as 5:2019cv00087
Defendant:
Warden F. Shaw, Deputy Warden T. Jackson, Case Manager T. Arbuthnot and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Charles Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stilley v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2019cv00006
Defendant:
J. F. Caraway, Hugh Hurwitz, Warden M. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Stilley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Harris v. Shaw et al
as 3:2018cv00669
Defendant:
Warden F. Shaw, Unknown Hooks, Unknown Chaplin and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Harris
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonson v. Matthews
as 2:2018cv00152
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Shondra Matthews
Plaintiff:
Kenny F. Edmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Figueron et al
as 3:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Arnell Lee
Defendant:
F. Figueron, T. Elrod, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Chancy et al
as 3:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ronwell Ewing
Defendant:
Unknown Chancy, Unknown Odom, Unknown Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Cavin Earl Reed
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, J. Wash, D. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. M.T.C. et al
as 3:2017cv00998
Plaintiff:
Louis Elliott
Defendant:
M.T.C., D. Chapman, N. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorman v. USP Yazoo City et al
as 3:2017cv00939
Plaintiff:
James F. Gorman
Defendant:
USP Yazoo City and Unknown Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
