Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Brown v. Thomas et al
as 4:2019cv00955
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Brown
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Thomas, Sgt. Dwan Bostic and Prvt. Shavonne Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrington v. West Glen Campbell Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv02743
Defendant:
Officer Michia Johnson, Cpl. Debra Quick, West Glen Campbell Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Jejauncey Fernando Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bronson Shelley v. Bryan P. Stirling, et al
as 4:2018cv02637
Defendant:
Patrick R. Jones, Officer Quick, Lt. Marlon Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Bronson Shelley, #1589035
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prescott v. Fox et al
as 2:2018cv00965
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Prescott
Defendant:
Officer Fox, Corpal Ford, Officer Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warrick et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv03326
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Ocean, Correctional Officer Sgt. Lockemy, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
James Hardin, John State, David Warrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
M. et al v. North Charleston, City of et al
as 2:2016cv01087
Plaintiff:
Gary M. , Garyonna M. , April Zealous and others
Defendant:
North Charleston, City of , Bradley Woods , Scott Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Quick et al
as 2:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamont Rogers
Defendant:
Officer Quick, Lt Jefferson and Officer Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gold v. Bathea et al
as 1:2014cv01191
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Gold
Defendant:
J Bathea, E Buttinger, A Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Drew
as 9:2011cv02059
Petitioner:
Walter Curtis Quick
Respondent:
Ms D Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quick v. Drew
as 5:2011cv02059
Petitioner:
Walter Curtis Quick
Respondent:
Ms D Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
